Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy W
I8150, I8150T, I8150B| Global Score | |
| 57.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 2.3 | -- |
| 2011-08-24 | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.55 x 2.36 x 0.45 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.93 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 252 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Single-Core 1400 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 530 hours standby time 18.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy W's general score of 57.8. The Galaxy S9 design is noticeably newer and notably thinner, but notably heavier than the Samsung Galaxy W. The Galaxy S9 features a much greater processing power than Galaxy W, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy W, because it has a way higher pixel amount per screen inch, a much bigger display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S9 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy W, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy W, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that supports up to 400 GB. The Galaxy S9 has a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy W, because it has a 100% larger battery size.
Galaxy S9 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.