Compare phones
Motorola Moto E
for America| Global Score | |
| 51.8 | 56.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Tizen | Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2 |
| 2020-08-06 | 2014-05-13 |
| 1.82 x 1.77 x 0.44 inches | 4.91 x 2.55 x 0.48 inches |
| -- | 5.01 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 480.00 | $ 105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.4 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 360 x 360 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 364 pixels per inch | 256 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9110 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Dual-Core 1150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP1 GPU | Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 7.83 | 8.1 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 4 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.3 | 3.82 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 5.00 MP |
| 0 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 5.5 | 4.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 340mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1980mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 1.36 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto E has a score of 56.9, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Watch 3 (45mm)'s 51.8 score. Moto E counts with Android 4.4.4 operating system, and Galaxy Watch 3 (45mm) counts with Tizen operating system. The Motorola Moto E counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Watch 3 (45mm), and although they both have 2 cpu cores and 1 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola Moto E also has a GPU.
The Moto E counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 (45mm), because although it has a way lower count of pixels in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 960 x 540 and a lot bigger display. Motorola Moto E features a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Watch 3 (45mm), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 32 GB.
Motorola Moto E has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Watch 3 (45mm), because it has 1980mAh of battery capacity against 340mAh. Moto E captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 (45mm).
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Moto E is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.