Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 29.8 | 32.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | 2007-03-27 |
| -- | 3.89 x 1.77 x 0.70 inches |
| -- | 3.88 ounces |
| Black, Silver and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 90.00 |
| -- | 128 x 160 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| -- | 102 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 30,72 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.3 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| -- | CDMA |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li - Ion Battery | 950mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 450 hours standby time 4.2 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola W385 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic (42mm), with a score of 32.6 against 29.8. The Galaxy Watch 4 Classic (42mm) and the Motorola W385 both count with similar CPUs, although the Motorola W385 has lesser processing cores. Motorola W385 has a much better looking display than Galaxy Watch 4 Classic (42mm).
The Motorola W385 shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy Watch 4 Classic (42mm). Galaxy Watch 4 Classic (42mm) features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola W385, because it has 8 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola W385 has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic (42mm).
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Motorola W385 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.