Search


Compare phones

Global Score
29.832.6
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
--2012-05-15
--4.35 x 1.85 x 0.61 inches
--3.02 ounces
Black, Silver and White--
Scratch-Resistant Glass--
$ 349.00$ 99.00
Display / Screen
--1.8 inches
--128 x 160 pixels
Super AMOLED LCD
--114 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
2.75.3
processor processor
--16 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.67
Storage
8 GB internal memory10,24 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
3.31.52
Camera
--0.30 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
04.4
--EDGE, GPRS and GSM
--SIM, Dual SIM
00.4
Battery Life
Li - Ion Battery1400mAh Li-Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
--839 hours standby time
14 hours talk time
1.363.12
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPS--
NFC--
Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor--

Comparison review

The Nokia 112 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic (42mm), getting a score of 32.6 against 29.8. The Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 Classic (42mm) counts with a little better hardware performance than Nokia 112, because it has a higher number of cores. The Nokia 112 has a way better looking display than Galaxy Watch 4 Classic (42mm).

Galaxy Watch 4 Classic (42mm) has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia 112, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 8 GB internal memory. Nokia 112 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Watch 4 Classic (42mm). Nokia 112 features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Watch 4 Classic (42mm).

Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Nokia 112 is also a bargain compared to others, making it an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.