Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Win
Dual SIMGT-I8550, GT-I8552
| Global Score | |
| 60.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.25 x 2.78 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 175.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 199 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8225Q chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 203 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy Win, having a 78.9 score against 60.7. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Win has Android 4.1, offering some extra features and some performance improvements. Google Pixel 3a XL's construction is somewhat thinner but somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy Win.
Google Pixel 3a XL features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Win, because it has a bigger display, a way better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px. Google Pixel 3a XL features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Win, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Win, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more processing cores and more RAM memory. Google Pixel 3a XL captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Win, because it has a back facing camera with a lot higher 12.2 mega-pixels resolution and a much better (4K) video quality.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Win, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3a XL is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.