Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Win
GT-I8550, GT-I8552| Global Score | |
| 60.7 | 66.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.1 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2017-06-22 |
| 5.25 x 2.78 x 0.38 inches | 5.69 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 175.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 199 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8225Q chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 8920 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 203 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto E4 has a global score of 66.5, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Win's overall score of 60.7. The Motorola Moto E4 is a a little thinner but a little bit heavier phone than the Galaxy Win. Moto E4 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy Win, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, and they both have the same number of cores, the Moto E4 also counts with 1 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Win features a little more vivid screen than Moto E4, although it has a much lower 800 x 480px resolution, a way worse pixel density and a bit smaller display. The Moto E4 has a way bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy Win, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
The Moto E4 has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Win, because it has a 40% bigger battery capacity. The Motorola Moto E4 takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Win, because it has a way higher 1920x1080 video definition and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Motorola Moto E4 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.