Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 9.x |
| 2019-07-20 | 2015-09-09 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 4.8 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 6s is better than the Galaxy Xcover 4S, getting a score of 83 against 73.8. Even though Apple iPhone 6s is a lot older than the Galaxy Xcover 4S, it's construction is thinner and lighter. Apple iPhone 6s has iOS 9.x operating system, while Galaxy Xcover 4S has Android 10 operating system.
IPhone 6s features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1334 x 750 pixels and a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen. IPhone 6s features slightly more storage for games and applications than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The iPhone 6s counts with a better CPU than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has an inferior number of cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor and an extra graphics co-processor. The iPhone 6s features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less megapixels and a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Galaxy Xcover 4S counts with a much better battery life than iPhone 6s, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity instead of 1715mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.