Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-20 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S's 73.8 general score. The Apple iPhone X construction is much thinner than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, but it's just a bit heavier and was released around 21 months before. The iPhone X has a better hardware performance than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone X also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone X features a much sharper screen than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px, a much greater pixels number per screen inch and a bigger screen. IPhone X counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Apple iPhone X takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a way lower 12 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution. Galaxy Xcover 4S has a bit better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 3 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.