Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-07-20 | 2015-10-01 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 has an overall score of 78.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy Xcover 4S's 73.8 overall score. Both devices we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but LG V10 has the older 5.1 version and Galaxy Xcover 4S has Android 10 version. The LG V10 body is thinner than the Galaxy Xcover 4S, although it is somewhat heavier and was released many years before.
LG V10 has a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a much greater number of pixels per inch in the display, a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a quite larger screen. The Galaxy Xcover 4S features a bit more powerful CPU than LG V10, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores.
LG V10 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V10 has a much better camera than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the LG V10 also counts with a much better (4K) video quality.
The LG V10 has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.