Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-07-20 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z3 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, with a score of 77.6 against 73.8. Even though Motorola Moto Z3 is older than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, it's construction is a lot thinner and just a bit lighter. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Moto Z3 has 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S has Android 10 version.
The Moto Z3 has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a bigger display, a way higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a higher display density. The Motorola Moto Z3 has a bit faster processor than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Moto Z3 features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z3 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos and a back camera with a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Motorola Moto Z3 has just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a 3000mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.