Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-20 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is a bit better than the Galaxy Xcover 4S, having a score of 80 against 73.8. The Motorola One Zoom body is just a little heavier but a bit thinner than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and both of them were released only a couple months apart. The Motorola One Zoom features a bit better processing power than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola One Zoom also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Motorola One Zoom has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bigger screen. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola One Zoom shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Motorola One Zoom also has a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Motorola One Zoom counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.