Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-07-20 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S's 73.8 score. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is newer and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S's, although it's heavier. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S has Android 10, giving a couple nice extra features.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a larger screen, a greater display pixels density and a lot better 876 x 2142 resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with lot more MP.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a battery duration that's just as good as the battery lifetime in Galaxy Xcover 4S.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.