Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-07-20 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, with a overall score of 93.6 against 73.8. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 5G has newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S has Android 10. Even though Galaxy S10 5G and the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S were released with only a couple months difference, Galaxy S10 5G's body is thinner but heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a really larger screen, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a way higher screen density. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a way better video quality and a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low light situations.
Galaxy S10 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a 61 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.