Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-07-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, getting a general score of 95.4 against 73.8. These phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner, but way heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better looking display than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a way bigger display, a lot higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a lot higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a greater camera than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos in low light environments, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.