Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-07-20 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S's score of 73.8. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body is newer and a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S's, but it is incredibly heavier. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 10 OS (operating system).
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a superior performance than Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a greater count of pixels per inch of display, a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a really bigger display.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a much higher video definition.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a little bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a 68% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.