Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2021-03-12 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a global score of 85.3, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5's 78.1 overall score. IPhone 11 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 counts with Android 11 operating system. The iPhone 11 Pro Max design is thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, although it's a lot heavier and was released about a year before.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a way better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a greater display pixel density, a larger display and a much higher 1242 x 2688 resolution. IPhone 11 Pro Max features a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a better camera than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition. Galaxy XCover 5 features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy XCover 5 also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB.
IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 32 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.