Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-12 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 311 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a general score of 82, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5's score of 78.1. IPhone XR is a much older and heavier cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, but Apple managed to make it a bit thinner anyway. IPhone XR counts with a better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has lesser RAM memory and 2 lesser cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone XR features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a little higher screen pixel density, a little higher resolution of 828 x 1792 and a bigger screen. IPhone XR captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the iPhone XR also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy XCover 5 counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games than iPhone XR, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy XCover 5 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Apple iPhone XR features a battery life that is very similar to the Galaxy XCover 5 one, although the Apple iPhone XR has just 2942mAh of battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.