Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-12 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is slightly better than Galaxy XCover 5, getting an 80.2 score against 78.1. Google Pixel's body is a little bit thinner and lighter than Galaxy XCover 5, although it was released many years before. The Galaxy XCover 5 counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy XCover 5 also has 4 more CPU cores (although they are slower).
Google Pixel counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch. Google Pixel captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a tinier aperture and a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy XCover 5 features a little better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.