Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-12 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the Galaxy XCover 5's score of 78.1. LG Velvet's design is somewhat thinner than the Galaxy XCover 5, although it is just a little heavier and was released just 10 months before. LG Velvet features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a greater pixel amount in each inch in the screen, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a larger display.
The LG Velvet has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG Velvet also has more RAM memory.
LG Velvet captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the LG Velvet also has a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a much higher resolution camera in the back. LG Velvet counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.