Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-12 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, getting a general score of 91.2 against 78.1. These devices come with Android OS, but the LG Wing has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the LG Wing construction is somewhat thicker and notably heavier than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5.
LG Wing counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has more RAM. The LG Wing features a little more vivid display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a larger screen and a greater screen density.
LG Wing counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal memory. LG Wing captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same aperture, the LG Wing also has a much better video quality and a back facing camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The LG Wing has longer battery life than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.