Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-12 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has a global score of 89.6, which is better than Galaxy XCover 5's 78.1 overall score. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola edge design is older, a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the Galaxy XCover 5. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola edge has the previous 10 version while Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version.
The Motorola edge has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a little bit better screen pixels density, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bigger screen. The Motorola edge counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola edge also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola edge features much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits 24 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola edge counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
The Motorola edge counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola edge also has a much better video definition and a much higher 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.