Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-12 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Galaxy XCover 5, having a overall score of 87.1 against 78.1. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is extremely newer and a bit thinner than Galaxy XCover 5's, although it is heavier. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a greater display density and a bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a back facing camera with way more megapixels, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.