Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-12 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 311 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, getting a overall score of 86.2 against 78.1. Both phones we compare here use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that. The Moto G200 5G construction is somewhat heavier but just a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and both were released with only a few months difference.
Moto G200 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM memory. Motorola Moto G200 5G features a bit better looking display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a higher pixel count per inch in the display and a larger display.
The Moto G200 5G takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a much better video definition.
Galaxy XCover 5 features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB. Moto G200 5G features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.