Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-03-12 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5's global score of 78.1. Even though the Galaxy A52 5G and Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 were released only a few months apart, the Galaxy A52 5G construction is just a little bit thinner but just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version.
Galaxy A52 5G has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a much better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a larger display and a greater pixel amount in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has more internal memory. The Galaxy A52 5G takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a way higher (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.