Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-03-12 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is much better than the Galaxy XCover 5's 78.1 global score. Both phones in this review work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Even though the Galaxy A52s and Galaxy XCover 5 were only released with a few months difference, Galaxy A52s's design is just a little heavier but a little bit thinner than Galaxy XCover 5.
Galaxy A52s counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A52s also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a larger display, more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A52s captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52s also has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a back facing camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A52s has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.