Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-12 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, with a general score of 98.9 against 78.1. Although the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 were released with only a few months difference, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design is heavier but also somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a sharper screen than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a way greater display pixels density, a lot larger screen and a much higher 1440 x 3088 resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 50% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.