Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-12 | 2015-08-21 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, having an 80.2 score against 78.1. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note5 is noticeably older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, it's construction is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter. The Galaxy Note5 has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a way higher 1440 x 2560px resolution, a quite bigger screen and a lot better pixel density.
The Galaxy XCover 5 features a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy XCover 5 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy Note5 counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover 5. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Galaxy Note5 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light images, and they both have a camera in the back with a 16 mega pixels resolution, the Galaxy Note5 also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a battery life that's very similar to Galaxy XCover 5's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.