Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-12 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, having an 88.3 score against 78.1. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features. Although the Galaxy S10 is much older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, it's design is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter.
Galaxy S10 features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a way better 1440 x 3040 resolution, a bigger screen and a much greater pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports 512 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a much lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.