Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-12 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is better than Galaxy XCover 5's overall score of 78.1. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's body is thinner than Galaxy XCover 5, although it's heavier and was released around 22 months before. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide you the same OS features.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little better performance than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a larger display, much more pixels per screen inch and a much better 1440 x 3040 resolution.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a slightly better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S10 5G features a superior battery life than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a better camera than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a back facing camera with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.