Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-12 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, having a 94.8 score against 78.1. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features. Although Samsung Galaxy S20 is older than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, it's body is just a little bit lighter and thinner.
Galaxy S20 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a way better 1440 x 3200 resolution, a much higher display pixel density and a bigger display.
The Galaxy S20 takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a back camera with a way worse resolution, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 also counts with a much better video definition. Galaxy S20 counts with a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has superior battery duration than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.