Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-03-12 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is much better than Galaxy XCover 5's 78.1 general score. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version while Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version. Galaxy S22's design is newer, just a bit lighter and thinner than the Galaxy XCover 5.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 has a way better display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a larger screen, a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a greater pixel quantity per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also has a much higher video definition and a back-facing camera with much more MP. Galaxy XCover 5 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy S22 features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.