Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-03-12 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than Galaxy XCover 5, with a 95.4 score against 78.1. Even though Galaxy S22 Ultra is way heavier than Galaxy XCover 5, it's just a bit thinner and newer. Both devices in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a lot higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a larger display.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better camera than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with lot more MP. Galaxy XCover 5 has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.