Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-12 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, with a general score of 88.5 against 78.1. The Galaxy Z Flip body is noticeably thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, but it's a little bit heavier and was released just 13 months before. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version, providing a couple additional features and performance optimizations.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a higher pixel density, a larger screen and a much better 1080 x 2636 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip features a superior camera than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a camera in the back with much less mega pixels, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip also counts with a way higher video resolution. Galaxy Z Flip has slightly more storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 10% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.