Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 93.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-12 | 2020-04-21 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Alpine white and Solstice grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.86 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, getting a general score of 93.1 against 78.1. Even though Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro is older and somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, it's design is still a little bit thinner. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has just a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro features a better looking display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a larger screen and a lot better 1080 x 2340px resolution. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro counts with a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a way better camera than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a much better video definition and a lot higher 108 MP resolution back-facing camera. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro features a way better battery life than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 50% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.