Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-12 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5's overall score of 78.1. Both devices in this review use Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11. Although Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is older and incredibly heavier than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, it's body is still just a little thinner.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a higher screen pixel density and a bigger display.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy XCover 5 has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.