Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-03-12 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 311 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5's 78.1 score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is an older and somewhat heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, but Xiaomi managed to build it a little bit thinner anyway. These devices have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better looking display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a better display pixel density, a bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy XCover 5 features a better storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover 5 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.