Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2022-06-29 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having a overall score of 83.3 against 77.6. The Apple iPhone 11 works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro comes with Android 12 operating system. The Apple iPhone 11 body is lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
IPhone 11 has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a bit lower display pixels density, a much lower resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels and a little smaller display. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 11, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The iPhone 11 features a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser processing cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 11, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 3110mAh.
The iPhone 11 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with much less megapixels resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the iPhone 11 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.