Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2022-06-29 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having an 85.3 score against 77.6. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max's construction is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, even though it was released many years before. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with Android 12 operating system.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a much faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. IPhone 11 Pro Max has a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1242 x 2688 resolution and a just a little higher pixel density.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 2% bigger battery size.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max takes a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lot less mega pixels back camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.