Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | iOS 9.x |
| 2022-06-29 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 6 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 6s has a global score of 83, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's global score of 77.6. The Apple iPhone 6s construction is extremely thinner and notably lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 7 years before. The Apple iPhone 6s counts with iOS 9.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 operating system.
Apple iPhone 6s features a very superior processing unit than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and an additional graphics processor. The iPhone 6s counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a much smaller screen, a just a bit lower pixels density and a lot lower resolution of 1334 x 750px.
The iPhone 6s captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower 12 MP resolution and a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photos or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone 6s, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than iPhone 6s, because it has a 136% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.