Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a general score of 87.1, which is better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 global score. Apple iPhone 8 Plus's body is lighter and noticeably thinner than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, even though it was released many years before. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 2 less cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a bit higher screen density. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with more memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The iPhone 8 Plus features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the iPhone 8 Plus also counts with a way larger sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.