Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is much better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having an 88.1 score against 77.6. Even though Apple iPhone X is extremely older than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's design is notably lighter and thinner. The iPhone X has a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
IPhone X counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display and a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with more storage for apps and games than iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 4050mAh battery size. The Apple iPhone X has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a much lower resolution back-facing camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.