Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, with a general score of 82 against 77.6. The iPhone XR construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it was released many years before. The iPhone XR counts with a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has 2 less cpu cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone XR has just a bit better screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a little bit smaller display, a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792 and a little less pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a superior memory for games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The iPhone XR has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a way less MP camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the iPhone XR also counts with a much bigger sensor. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 38 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.