Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 overall score. Even though iPhone XS is way older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's construction is much thinner and lighter. The iPhone XS counts with a much more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Apple iPhone XS counts with a brighter display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a little higher screen pixels density. The iPhone XS counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lot lower 12 MP resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the iPhone XS also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a very superior battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has a 4050mAh battery size against 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.