Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 general score. Google Pixel is an way older cellphone than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but Google managed to build it somewhat thinner and notably lighter anyway. The Google Pixel counts with a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser processing cores.
The Google Pixel features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Google Pixel captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with way less MP and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.