Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 399 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is a bit better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, getting a score of 77.7 against 77.6. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has 5.0 version while Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12. The HTC One M9 body is noticeably lighter and just a little thinner than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, even though it was released 7 years before.
HTC One M9 has a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater number of pixels per display inch. HTC One M9 features a very superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a GPU.
The HTC One M9 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with a way worse 20 mega-pixels resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, it also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing way better quality photographs.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a very superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 4050mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.