Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a general score of 77.6, which is just a bit better than the HTC U Ultra's overall score of 77. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is a notably newer phone than HTC U Ultra, although it's a lot heavier and much thicker. HTC U Ultra has a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores.
The HTC U Ultra has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater pixels density. The HTC U Ultra captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the HTC U Ultra also counts with a way larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a slightly better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.