Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-06-29 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having an 81 score against 77.6. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the LG G7 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version, so it provides lots of additional features and performance optimizations. LG G7 ThinQ's design is lighter and noticeably thinner than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, even though it was released many years before.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with an incredibly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and a greater display pixel density. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
LG G7 ThinQ features a much better performing processor than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The LG G7 ThinQ features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a way bigger sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.