Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, getting an 81.3 score against 77.6. The LG V35 ThinQ is an a lot older phone than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but it's a lot lighter and noticeably thinner anyway. LG V35 ThinQ has a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a higher pixel density. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with a way worse 16 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photography and video and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.