Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, getting a global score of 87.1 against 77.6. LG Velvet's construction is way lighter and incredibly thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. The LG Velvet features a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
LG Velvet has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a just a bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a quite larger display. The LG Velvet features a bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity. LG Velvet takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with less mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.