Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| -- | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 general score. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Moto G200 5G has older 11 version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12. The Moto G200 5G body is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, even when both were released only a few months apart.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a just a little inferior count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a bit larger screen. The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a way better processing power than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Moto G200 5G has a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way more MP back camera. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.